You are currently browsing the archives.



BNP Membership in Surrey

Still analysing the leaked BNP membership list - but still sticking to the statistics and avoiding the personal details!

The part of Surrey that Wealden UAF covers includes Redhill, Merstham, Reigate, Oxted, Horley, Felbridge, Lingfield… that sort of area: the postcode areas RH1 to RH9 and RH19.

Within that area there are a mere 34 members listed, living in 28 households.  10 are listed as activists and, again, the presence of the few BNP members known to us lends some weight to the authenticity of the list. The breakdown is:

Redhill 5
Reigate 10
Merstham 6
Horley 5
Other 8

It looks like the same picture as in Crawley and Horsham - a few empty vessels making a lot of noise. But the warning signs are there too.  We have seen how much attention the two activists and four others in Merstham have managed to attract: imagine what they could do with a whole ten members…

BNP Membership in Horsham

Taking a fairly generous definition of the Horsham area - all of the RH12 and RH13 postcodes, plus the BN44 postcode area (so that includes Lower Beeding, Rusper, Broadbridge Heat, Roffey, Partridge Green, Southwater etc.) the leaked list of BNP members contains 40 names in Horsham and surrounding villages, living in 33 separate households.  Just seven are tagged as activists.

So memberships seems to be at similar levels to Crawley, but a lower proportion are active.  This could be because they are more spread out and have fewer expectations of success, and because they are concentrating their efforts more on neighbouring Crawley.

Again, this pitiful level of membership (no wonder Griffin was less than pleased about the leak!) should not tempt us into complacency.  We have seen how just a few people can give the appearance of greater numbers if they are fanatical and well-organised- but these low numbers should give us some comfort.

 

BNP Membership in Crawley

Thanks to somebody getting hold of the BNP's membership list and posting it on the Internet, we now know something about the probably levels of their membership. Posting lists of individuals' personal details on the web is of dubious morality and legality so we are not linking to it, nor reproducing any of the personal information here, but we will do a bit of statistical analysis.  (Anybody who really wants to see the list could probably find it easily enough without our help anyway.  They may even find the spreadsheet version that we used for this analysis)

It looks like the list produced is fairly accurate and quite up-to-date.  Certainly everybody who we know of appears on the list, although it appears from comments elsewhere that the list also contains non-members - those who have left the party, those who never joined but made donations, children of party members who may not even know they are on the list, etc.  The point is that this list probably represents the maximum membership and real figures could well be lower.

In the RH10 and RH11 postcode areas there are 53 names.  Three of them live in places like Crawley Down and Copthorne so there are 50 'members' in Crawley itself.   Of those 50, 14 are tagged as activists.

The spread of members is as follows:

Bewbush 6
Broadfield 3
Furnace Green 11
Gossops Green 2
Ifield 5
Northgate 3
Pound Hill 6
Southgate 5
Three Bridges 1
Tilgate 5
West Green 3
Maidenbower

0

So, Furnace Green supplies 22% of the BNP's membership in Crawley.  Looking in a bit more detail we see that 8 of those names come from just two households -so there are only five houses containing BNP members in Furnace Green.

Looking further afield we can see that just four families represent nearly a third of the BNP membership in town (32%= 16 people).  Apart from Furnace Green no neighbourhood contains more than half a dozen members, and there is not a single member in the whole of Maidenbower.

That is the good news: the British National Party do not actually have the level of support they would like us to think that they have.  Through a combination of fanaticism and hard work by a few of those members,  imported literature in large amounts, and possibly help from neighbouring towns they do try, and largely succeed in making it look as if they have more support than they actually do.

And that is the bad news.  They may have fewer members than any of the three main parties in the town, but those few are extremely efficient, extremely committed, extremely effectiv…  and just extreme really.

The rest of us can take some comfort in the confirmation that BNP membership is a lot lower than they would want us to think, but we must not let that be an excuse for complacency: what they lack in numbers they make up for with effort.

Some similar analysis of other parts of the Wealden area to follow.